TOS50 News

12/05/2018

We Say Goodbye to George H.W. Bush

Read the full story

11/24/2018

America Takes Pleasure in the Royals

Read the full story

11/23/2018

President Trump's Ties to Saudi Arabia

Read the full story

11/14/2018

France fires back at Trump's lack of "common decency"

Read the full story

Anatomy of a Wall

Anatomy of a Wall

Is there ever a point in time when it is acceptable to throw bombs that kill innocent people?

Over the years I have visited Israel with some frequency.  There was a time, not that long ago, when I would not ever consider taking public transportation; suicide bombings had become too common place and public busses were often targeted.  In fact, at that point in time, my own synagogue raised money to help support an immigrant family who had fled to Israel to escape anti-Semitism and oppression in Russia.  A short time after their arrival, they found themselves in a car stopped at a red light directly behind a bus that was attacked by a suicide bomber.  The driver of the car, the husband, father and primary wage earner for the family was critically injured.  He spent months in a hospital undergoing many, many surgeries and will never be completely whole again.  This happened because it was relatively easy for Palestinians to cross the green line and enter Israel to work, take in a movie, or throw a bomb. 

I am certainly in favor of a two-state solution.  Like so many others, I know and understand the genesis of the current Israeli/Palestinian impasse.  I have been to the West Bank myself several times and I am very sympathetic to the difficulties faced by the Palestinian people who live there.  However, Israelis have also suffered the loss of their sons and daughters.  The barrier wall was erected to save Israelis from suicide bombers and as such has been successful. Suicide bombings have almost disappeared as a result of the wall being in place – and people, myself included, are once again comfortable traveling on public transportation in Israel   Thus, we have another impasse:  Israelis believe the wall is necessary to ensure their own security.  Palestinians feel trapped and believe this wall is an Israeli plot to take away land that belongs to the Palestinian people.  There are those who point out that Israel won that land in a war that was not of their own making; however, that may have been true in 1967, but we have to come to a solution that is credible in 2014.   We can learn from our past, but we must live in the present. 

Added to the quagmire that perpetually exists in Israel is the visit of Pope Francis.  Pope Francis has, with reason, won over the hearts of people around the world. You don’t have to be Christian to appreciate the goodness of this man.  He is an inspiration to everyone.  I am, therefore, somewhat surprised and disappointed that he chose to inject himself into the volatile politics that exists between the Israelis and the Palestinians.   The Pope, apparently unexpectedly, chose to stop and pray at the barrier wall.  According to news reports the image of him praying at that spot is likely to become "the most emblematic of his trip to the holy land."   He certainly let the Palestinians know that he is sympathetic to their cause, which would be fine if it didn’t also send a message to the Israelis that he believes the barrier wall should come down -- but removing the barrier wall presents other problems..  

Given the current circumstances, there is little doubt that if the barrier wall comes down, the suicide bombers once again will have easier access into Israel.  Israelis and Palestinians must work out an agreement so they both can survive in peace.  Since I do not believe that Pope Francis values Palestinian lives more than Israeli lives, his behavior in praying at the barrier wall appears to be somewhat miguided and, I think, increases the volatility of the current situation in that area.  Implying that Israel take down the wall without having any kind of agreement in place is tantamount to saying that it is acceptable to throw bombs that kill innocent people living in Israel, because given the politics of 2014, should the wall come down, that is exactly what will happen.

 

The following article is excerpted from the Jewish Daily Forward, by Gal Beckerman:

Netanyahu hurriedly asked Francis to visit another wall, one at a memorial for the victims of Palestinian terror attacks. Francis went and once again stood in prayer before a wall. But this was one too many walls for a single papal trip. That image was ignored, more an illustration of Marx’s famous dictum about history repeating itself first as tragedy and second as farce.

Truth is, all walls built by states are not alike in meaning and function. The Western Wall was once part of the outer perimeter of the Jewish Temple, presumably meant to delineate sacred from profane space, and also to keep out unwanted visitors. As a symbol it came to stand for redemption, a physical place where Jews concentrated their longing for a return to Zion.

This has nothing to do with the separation barrier, which broadly symbolizes oppression to the Palestinians and their supporters. Redemption is not really what it represents — the keys to their pre-1948 homes serve that iconic function for Palestinian families.

But it’s in the nature of an icon that much of this murkiness of meaning gets overlooked.

The separation barrier for many years now has been compared to the Berlin Wall — another patently false analogy. First from a technical point of view, the separation barrier, when it is completed, will only have a wall on 10 percent of its path (albeit a wall that is a monstrous 26-feet tall) and otherwise is and will be more like a fence bordered by wide trenches and much surveillance. So it’s only partly a wall. But, more importantly, whereas the Berlin Wall kept a people that wanted to be united separate, the separation barrier keeps divided two peoples who have no interest in coexisting in the same land. There is a certain absurdity to talk of “tearing down the wall,” when resolving the Israeli-Palestinian conflict couldn’t be further from the ecstasy of the Berlin Wall’s fall and the joyous reunification of Germans popping champagne and hugging each other.

But that hasn’t stopped the analogy. It makes its ways into the graffiti that covers the wall portion of the barrier and into the language of activists like Roger Waters. The Pink Floyd front man performed his rock opera “The Wall” along the remnants of the Berlin Wall in 1990 to celebrate reunification. And now he talks of tearing down this wall. “It may be a lot harder to get this one down, but eventually it must happen,” Waters recently said.

There are good reasons to hate the wall, but Waters seems confused. Palestinians understand what the separation barrier really is, what it means: another form of land grab. The barrier was built not along the 1967 green line, but in such a way that it makes incursions into the West Bank, including large settlement blocs on Israel’s side, sometimes cutting Palestinians communities in half or depriving them access to their fields. That’s probably the most factual sense in which the wall represents oppression.

Most Palestinians might not have a problem at all with a wall that ran directly along the green line. But the slogan, “move the wall over to the green line” is not quite as resonant as singing along with Pink Floyd to “tear down the wall.”

The separation barrier draws its meaning not out of its specificity but because it is a wall, and at the most basic level, walls are physical manifestations of power — from the Great Wall of China to Hadrian’s Wall to — yes — the Berlin Wall. Regardless of who they keep out or keep in, they stand in for the state that put them there and the power that state wields over individual lives.

But there’s a flip side. This also makes them very good sites for opposing power, for making what would otherwise be nebulous and hard to illustrate quite literally concrete.

It’s difficult to make checkpoints dramatic. But a wall is a wall. It is imposing, a colossal structure only a state could build and that insists on its existence. You can also throw things it at. It can become a canvas for expressing all that is crushing and inhumane about state power, especially when forced on unwilling non-citizens. And the Palestinians seem to understand this, either consciously or viscerally, giving them a huge weapon in the battle of international public opinion, which might be the only battle that really counts when it comes to this conflict.

It doesn’t matter that this wall shouldn’t really be compared to other walls. A wall is a wall. The portion of the barrier where Francis stood to pray was covered in graffiti. And just above his head in black spray paint were scrawled the words in broken English: “Bethlehem look like Warsaw Ghetto.”

This is absurd and repugnant to most of us. How can anyone possibly compare a wall constructed by Nazis to pen in Jews eventually headed to mass slaughter with the concrete slabs that skirt Bethlehem? And yet, it persuaded the pope to stop his car.



 

0 Comments

Post new comment

CAPTCHA
Due to spam, all comments require approval before posting. Please only submit your comment once and fill out the CAPTCHA. Thank you.
To prevent automated spam submissions leave this field empty.
Today is: December 19, 2018 - 9:37am
Subscribe Click to Subscribe

Sticky Posts